Breathing achievements: when the air turns into triumph (Part 2)

The different HIIT protocols: benefits of each one and considerations

Hello again Naturally fitters! Today’s post about the various HIIT protocols, complements the one we wrote a few weeks ago about these training methods, their proven benefits and how to understand the reasoning behind the work-to-rest ratios in these protocols. Let’s get started!

Each of the following HIIT training models, from the well-known Tabata, through the Little method, the 30-30, the 10-20 or the Pyramidal protocol, has its own advantages and challenges. The key is to vary and generate responses in all efforts. In any case, in all HIIT modalities it is crucial to warm up properly before starting and cool down at the end to avoid injury and maximize the benefits of the workout.

Tabata Method

The Tabata protocol is one of the most well-known high-intensity interval training (HIIT) methods, popularized through the work of Dr. Izumi Tabata and his team in Japan in the late 1990s.

  1. Protocol Structure:
    Effort: 20 seconds of all-out intensity exercise.
    Recovery: 10 seconds of rest.
    Repetition: This pattern of effort and recovery is repeated for 8 cycles, totaling 4 minutes.
  2. Total Duration:
    Including warm-up and cool-down, a complete session can last around 10-15 minutes, depending on how much time you allocate to these phases.
  3. Frequency:
    It’s suggested to perform Tabata training 3-4 times per week, with rest between sessions to allow for proper recovery.
  4. Type of Exercise:
    While it originated using ergometers (rowing machines), the Tabata protocol can be adapted to a wide variety of exercises, such as cycling, sprints, burpees, squats, among others.
  5. Demonstrated Benefits:
    Significant improvements in VO2 max.
    Increased anaerobic capacity.
    Efficient calorie burn in a short period of time.
    Muscular adaptations favorable for both aerobic and anaerobic performance.
  6. Comparison with Other HIIT Methods:
    The Tabata method is shorter in duration than the Little method but is more intense in terms of effort required in each interval.
  7. Key Studies:
    The most famous study, conducted by Dr. Tabata in 1996, was published in “Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise” and demonstrated that this protocol improved both aerobic and anaerobic capacity in elite athletes.
  8. Considerations:
    The Tabata method is an efficient form of HIIT that, while challenging, offers an accessible and simple alternative to other more intense and complicated protocols.

Little Method

The Little Method is a specific high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocol developed by researchers Jonathan P. Little and Martin J. Gibala. This method, often referred to in relation to Gibala’s studies, has been touted for its time efficiency and significant effects on cardiovascular and metabolic health.

  1. Protocol Structure:
    Effort: 60 seconds of exercise at approximately 90-95% of maximum heart rate.
    Recovery: 75 seconds of rest or low-intensity activity.
    Repetition: This pattern of effort and recovery is repeated for 8-12 cycles, depending on the individual’s fitness level and training progress.
  2. Total Duration:
    Including warm-up, intervals, and cool-down, a complete session lasts approximately 20-30 minutes.
  3. Frequency:
    It is recommended to perform this type of training 3 times per week.
  4. Type of Exercise:
    While initially investigated using stationary cycling, the method can be adapted to other types of exercises, such as running, jumping rope, or even rowing.
  5. Demonstrated Benefits:
    Improvements in insulin sensitivity.
    Increase in VO2 max (an indicator of aerobic capacity).
    Enhancement in anaerobic capacity.
    Muscle adaptations favoring performance in endurance exercises.
  6. Comparison with Other HIIT Methods:
    The Little Method is less intense than the Tabata protocol but longer in duration. Therefore, it offers a more moderate yet still challenging alternative.
  7. Key Studies:
    A significant study was published in 2009 in the “Journal of Physiology” where Little and Gibala demonstrated that HIIT training could deliver comparable results to traditional endurance exercise in less time.
  8. Considerations:
    In summary, the Little Method is an efficient form of HIIT that, while challenging, provides an accessible alternative to other more intense protocols.

30-30 Method

In this model, you alternate between 30 seconds of high-intensity exercise and 30 seconds of rest or light activity. It’s a 1:1 ratio between exercise and rest, allowing for complete recovery between intervals. It’s an excellent option for those who are new to the world of HIIT or for those seeking an intense yet balanced session.

  1. Protocol Structure:
    Effort: 30 seconds of high-intensity exercise, aiming to reach a working zone close to 90% of VO2 max.
    Recovery: 30 seconds of rest or low-intensity activity.
    Repetition: Depending on the goal and fitness level, this pattern can be repeated between 10 and 20 times.
  2. Total Duration:
    Depending on the number of cycles, the total duration of the workout can range between 10 and 20 minutes, not counting warm-up and cool-down time.
  3. Frequency:
    It’s suggested to perform the 30-30 training 2-3 times per week, allowing for rest between sessions for proper recovery.
  4. Type of Exercise:
    This method is versatile and can be adapted to various activities such as running, cycling, jumping rope, or bodyweight exercises.
  5. Demonstrated Benefits:
    Improvement in cardiovascular capacity.
    Muscle adaptations favorable to aerobic performance.
    Increased recovery capacity during intermittent efforts.
    Efficient calorie burn and promotion of fat loss.
  6. Comparison with Other HIIT Methods:
    The 30-30 method is less intense than Tabata but provides a balance between work and recovery time, making it more accessible for many practitioners.
  7. Key Studies:
    While not as famous as the Tabata method in terms of specific studies, the 30-30 protocol has been included in various research on HIIT and its benefits for cardiovascular capacity and metabolic adaptations.
  8. Considerations:
    The 30-30 method is a balanced HIIT alternative that offers a combination of effort and recovery, making it an excellent choice for those seeking to improve their fitness and cardiovascular health without reaching the extremes of the Tabata protocol. As always, it’s crucial to tailor any routine to individual capabilities and needs.

10-20 Method

This model is a HIIT strategy that focuses on short and explosive bursts of activity followed by longer recovery periods. Given the brief duration of the work intervals, it’s crucial to give it your all during those 10 seconds of maximum effort. It’s ideal for performing explosive and fast-paced exercises and for those seeking to enhance their anaerobic capacity and power in short intervals. As always, attention to technique, adjusting the training to individual capabilities, and ensuring the protocol aligns with personal goals are essential.

  1. Protocol Structure:
    Effort: 10 seconds of exercise at maximum intensity.
    Recovery: 20 seconds of rest or very low-intensity activity.
    Repetition: This pattern of effort and recovery is usually repeated between 10 and 30 times, depending on the individual’s fitness level and training goal. 
  2. Total Duration:
    Depending on the number of repetitions, the total duration ranges between 5 and 15 minutes, excluding warm-up and cool-down time. 
  3. Frequency:
    It is recommended to perform the 10-20 training 2-4 times per week, ensuring recovery periods between sessions. 
  4. Type of Exercise:
    Like other HIIT protocols, the 10-20 method is versatile and can be applied to activities such as running, cycling, plyometric exercises, or any activity that allows brief bursts of maximum intensity. 
  5. Demonstrated Benefits:
    Rapid improvements in cardiovascular capacity.
    Stimulation of metabolism for efficient calorie burning.
    Development of muscular adaptations benefiting both aerobic and anaerobic performance.
    Enhancement in recovery capacity during short-duration efforts. 
  6. Comparison with Other HIIT Methods:
    The 10-20 method is less intense and shorter in effort duration than the 30-30, but its recovery period is twice as long, allowing a focus on explosiveness during work intervals. 
  7. Key Studies:
    While not as extensively studied as the Tabata method or some other approaches, the 10-20 protocol has been utilized in research contexts addressing the benefits of HIIT in terms of cardiovascular and metabolic adaptations.
  8. Considerations:
    Due to the explosive nature of the 10-second intervals, it’s crucial to ensure proper warm-up to prepare muscles and joints and minimize the risk of injuries.

Pyramid Method

The idea behind this model is to gradually increase the effort time and then decrease it, forming a “pyramid.” An example could be 15 seconds of work followed by 30 seconds of rest, then 30 seconds of work with 30 seconds of rest, followed by 45 seconds of work with 30 seconds of rest, and then descending back. This method plays with the body’s ability to adapt and recover from different effort durations, making it a varied and dynamic challenge.

  1. Protocol Structure:
    Effort: Exercise times increase and then decrease in each cycle. For example, you can start with 10 seconds, then 20, 30, 40, and then go back to 30, 20, and 10.
    Recovery: Rest periods can be constant (for example, 30 seconds between each interval) or can vary inversely to the effort (the longer the effort, the shorter the rest, and vice versa).
    Repetition: Depending on the structure, there can be multiple “pyramids” in one session.
  2. Total Duration:
    It varies based on the specific pyramid structure and the number of cycles, but sessions typically last between 20 and 40 minutes, including warm-up and cool-down.
  3. Frequency:
    It is suggested to perform pyramid training 2-3 times per week, alternating it with other types of training to allow for proper recovery.
  4. Type of Exercise:
    The pyramid method is versatile and can be adapted to many activities, from running and cycling to bodyweight or weightlifting exercises.
  5. Demonstrated Benefits:
    Enhances cardiovascular and anaerobic endurance.
    Stimulates metabolism for efficient calorie burning.
    Increases work capacity and recovery in efforts of varied duration.
    Diversifies the stimulus, reducing training monotony.
  6. Comparison with Other HIIT Methods:
    The pyramid method offers a unique variety by altering effort duration, which can be more motivating and challenging than protocols with fixed times.
  7. Key Studies:
    While the pyramid method has been less clinically studied than other HIIT protocols, it has been recognized in the fitness and sports training world as an effective means to enhance overall physical fitness.
  8. Considerations:
    Ensuring that maximum intensity intervals are truly challenging and adjusting session intensity and duration to individual capacities is important. The pyramid method is a dynamic and versatile option within HIIT protocols, challenging the body to adapt to different effort durations in a single session. Ideal for those seeking variety and a composite cardiovascular challenge.

Conclusion

HIIT isn’t just a passing trend; it’s backed by a wealth of research showcasing its myriad benefits. Whether you’re aiming for cardiovascular improvement, fat reduction, or simply maximizing your time at the gym, HIIT can be a powerful tool in your training arsenal. So, the next time you want a quick yet effective workout, give HIIT a shot. Best of luck with your training!

References

Gibala, M. J., Little, J. P., MacDonald, M. J., & Hawley, J. A. (2012). Physiological adaptations to low‐volume, high‐intensity interval training in health and disease. The Journal of Physiology, 590(5), 1077-1084.
Weston, K. S., Wisløff, U., & Coombes, J. S. (2014). High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British journal of sports medicine, 48(16), 1227-1234.
Boutcher, S. H. (2010). High-intensity intermittent exercise and fat loss. Journal of Obesity, 2011.
Whyte, L. J., Gill, J. M., & Cathcart, A. J. (2010). Effect of 2 weeks of sprint interval training on health-related outcomes in sedentary overweight/obese men. Metabolism, 59(10), 1421-1428.

en_USEN